Komunikacija životinja — разлика између измена

С Википедије, слободне енциклопедије
Садржај обрисан Садржај додат
.
(нема разлике)

Верзија на датум 8. септембар 2023. у 20:13

Great egret (Ardea alba) in a courtship display communicating the desire to find a mate.

Animal communication is the transfer of information from one or a group of animals (sender or senders) to one or more other animals (receiver or receivers) that affects the current or future behavior of the receivers.[1] Information may be sent intentionally, as in a courtship display, or unintentionally, as in the transfer of scent from predator to prey with kairomones. Information may be transferred to an "audience" of several receivers.[2] Animal communication is a rapidly growing area of study in disciplines including animal behavior, sociology, neurology and animal cognition. Many aspects of animal behavior, such as symbolic name use, emotional expression, learning and sexual behavior, are being understood in new ways.

When the information from the sender changes the behavior of a receiver, the information is referred to as a "signal". Signalling theory predicts that for a signal to be maintained in the population, both the sender and receiver should usually receive some benefit from the interaction. Signal production by senders and the perception and subsequent response of receivers are thought to coevolve.[3] Signals often involve multiple mechanisms, e.g. both visual and auditory, and for a signal to be understood the coordinated behaviour of both sender and receiver require careful study.

Modovi

A lamb investigates a rabbit, an example of interspecific communication using body posture and olfaction.

Vizualno

  • Gestures: Most animals understand communication through a visual display of distinctive body parts or bodily movements. Animals will reveal or accentuate a body part to relay certain information. The parent herring gull displays its bright yellow bill on the ground next over its chick when it has returned to the nest with food. The chicks exhibit a begging response by tapping the red spot on the lower mandible of the parent herring gull's bill. This signal stimulates the parent to regurgitate food and completes the feeding signal. The distinctive morphological feature accentuated in this communication is the parent's red-spotted bill, while the tapping towards the ground makes the red spot visible to the chick, demonstrating a distinctive movement.[4] Frans de Waal studied bonobos and chimps to understand if language was somehow evolved by gestures. He found that both apes and humans only use intentional gestures to communicate.[5]
  • Facial expression: Another important signal of emotion in animal communication are facial gestures. Blue and Yellow Macaws were studied to understand how they reacted to interactions with a familiar animal care taker. Studies show that Blue and Yellow Macaws demonstrated a significant amount of blushing frequently during mutual interactions with a caretaker.[6] In another experiment, Jeffrey Mogil studied facial expression in mice in response to increments of increasing pain. He found that mice exhibited five recognizable face expressions: orbital tightening, nose and cheek bulge, and changes in ear and whisker carriage.[7]
  • Gaze-following: Social animals use gaze-following as a form of communication through monitoring head and eye orientation in other mammals.[8] Studies have been conducted on apes, monkeys, dogs, birds, wolves and tortoises, and have focused on two different tasks: "follow[ing] another's gaze into distant space" and "follow[ing] another's gaze geometrically around a visual barrier e.g. by repositioning themselves to follow a gaze cue when faced with a barrier blocking their view".[9] A broad range of animals have been proven to exhibit the latter, however only apes, dogs, wolves, and corvids (ravens) have been able to follow another's gaze into distant space. Marmosets and ibis were unable to demonstrate "geometric gaze following". Researchers do not yet have a clear picture of the cognitive basis of gaze following, but developmental evidence indicates that "simple" gaze following and "geometric" gaze following probably rely on different cognitive mechanisms.[8]
  • Color change: Color change can be separated into changes that occur during growth and development, and those triggered by mood, social context, or abiotic factors such as temperature. The latter are seen in many taxa. Some cephalopods, such as the octopus and the cuttlefish, have specialized skin cells (chromatophores) that can change the apparent colour, opacity, and reflectiveness of their skin.[10] In addition to their use for camouflage, rapid changes in skin color are used while hunting and in courtship rituals.[11] Cuttlefish may display two entirely different signals simultaneously from opposite sides of their body. When a male cuttlefish courts a female in the presence of other males, he displays a male pattern facing the female and a female pattern facing away, to deceive other males.[12] Some color signals occur in cycles. For example, when a female olive baboon begins to ovulate, her anogenital area swells and turns a bright red/pink. This signals to males that she is ready to mate.[13] Humboldt squid are bioluminescent and thus capable of communicating visually in dark ocean environments.[14]
  • Bioluminescent communication: Communication by the production of light occurs commonly in vertebrates and invertebrates in the oceans, particularly at depths (e.g. angler fish). Two well known forms of land bioluminescence occur in fireflies and glow worms. Other insects, insect larvae, annelids, arachnids and even species of fungi possess bioluminescent abilities. Some bioluminescent animals produce the light themselves whereas others have a symbiotic relationship with bioluminescent bacteria.[15] Animals exhibit bioluminescent light to lure in prey, attract a mate, or protect themselves from potential predators.[16]

Reference

  1. ^ „Animal communication”. Encyclopedia Britannica (на језику: енглески). Приступљено 2020-10-31. 
  2. ^ Seyfarth, Robert M.; Cheney, Dorothy L. (2003-02-01). „Signalers and Receivers in Animal Communication”. Annual Review of Psychology. 54 (1): 145—173. ISSN 0066-4308. PMID 12359915. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145121. 
  3. ^ Maynard-Smith and Harper, 2003
  4. ^ Tinbergen, N.; Perdeck, A. C. (1951-01-01). „On the Stimulus Situation Releasing the Begging Response in the Newly Hatched Herring Gull Chick (Larus Argentatus Argentatus Pont.)”. Behaviour (на језику: енглески). 3 (1): 1—39. ISSN 0005-7959. doi:10.1163/156853951X00197. 
  5. ^ Pollick, Amy S.; Waal, Frans B. M. de (2007-05-08). „Ape gestures and language evolution”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (на језику: енглески). 104 (19): 8184—8189. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.8184P. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 1876592Слободан приступ. PMID 17470779. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702624104Слободан приступ. 
  6. ^ „Facial display and blushing: Means of visual communication in blue-and-yellow macaws (Ara Ararauna)?” (на језику: енглески). ProQuest 2091762411. 
  7. ^ Mogil, Jeffrey S. (април 2009). „Animal models of pain: progress and challenges”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience (на језику: енглески). 10 (4): 283—294. ISSN 1471-003X. PMID 19259101. S2CID 205504814. doi:10.1038/nrn2606. 
  8. ^ а б Shepherd, Stephen V. (2010-03-19). „Following Gaze: Gaze-Following Behavior as a Window into Social Cognition”. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience. 4: 5. ISSN 1662-5145. PMC 2859805Слободан приступ. PMID 20428494. doi:10.3389/fnint.2010.00005Слободан приступ. 
  9. ^ Range, Friederike; Virányi, Zsófia (2011-02-23). Wylie, Doug, ур. „Development of Gaze Following Abilities in Wolves (Canis Lupus)”. PLOS ONE (на језику: енглески). 6 (2): e16888. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...616888R. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3044139Слободан приступ. PMID 21373192. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016888Слободан приступ. 
  10. ^ Cloney, R.A.; Florey, E. (1968). „Ultrastructure of cephalopod chromatophore organs”. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 89 (2): 250—280. PMID 5700268. S2CID 26566732. doi:10.1007/bf00347297. 
  11. ^ Hanlon, R.T.; Messenger, J.B. (1996). Cephalopod Behaviour. Cambridge University Press. стр. 121. ISBN 978-0-521-64583-6. 
  12. ^ Williams, Sarah (2012). „Two-faced fish tricks competitors”. Science Now. Архивирано из оригинала 8. 3. 2013. г. Приступљено 16. 3. 2013. 
  13. ^ Motluk, Alison (2001). „Big Bottom”. New Scientist. 19 (7). 
  14. ^ Deep Sea Squid May Communicate Through Glowing Pigmentation, Researchers Find
  15. ^ Mason, Julia (18. 7. 2018). „Glowing in the Deep”. The Dish on Science. 
  16. ^ „Bioluminescence | Smithsonian Ocean”. ocean.si.edu (на језику: енглески). Приступљено 2020-10-25. 

Literatura

  • Bickerton, D. (2005). Language evolution: a brief guide for linguists. link
  • Deacon, T. W. (1997) The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press, ISBN 0-393-03838-6
  • Fitch, W.T.; Hauser, M.D. (2004). „Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate” (PDF). Science. 303 (5656): 377—380. Bibcode:2004Sci...303..377F. PMID 14726592. S2CID 18306145. doi:10.1126/science.1089401. 
  • Fouts, R. S. (1973). „Acquisition and testing of gestural signs in four young chimpanzees”. Science. 180 (4089): 978—80. Bibcode:1973Sci...180..978F. PMID 17735931. S2CID 38389519. doi:10.1126/science.180.4089.978. 
  • Gabrić P (2022). „Overlooked evidence for semantic compositionality and signal reduction in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)”. Animal Cognition. 25 (3): 631—643. PMID 34822011. doi:10.1007/s10071-021-01584-3. 
  • Gardner R. Allen and Gardner Beatrice T. (1980) Comparative psychology and language acquisition. In Thomas A. Sebok and Jean-Umiker-Sebok (eds.): Speaking of Apes: A Critical Anthology of Two-Way Communication with Man. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 287–329.
  • Gomez, R.L; Gerken, L. (2000). „Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4 (5): 178—186. PMID 10782103. S2CID 15933380. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01467-4. 
  • Goodall, J. (1964). „Tool Using and Aimed Throwing in a Community of Free-Living Chimpanzees”. Nature. 201 (4926): 1264—1266. Bibcode:1964Natur.201.1264G. PMID 14151401. S2CID 7967438. doi:10.1038/2011264a0. 
  • Hauser, M.D.; Chomsky, N.; Fitch, W.T. (2002). „The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?”. Science. 298 (5598): 1569—1579. PMID 12446899. doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569. 
  • Hayes, C. (1951). The Ape in Our House. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Herman, L. M.; Forestell, P. H. (1985). „Reporting presence or absence of named objects by a language-trained dolphin”. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 9 (4): 667—691. PMID 4080284. S2CID 6959236. doi:10.1016/0149-7634(85)90013-2. 
  • Herman, L. M. Kuczaj; Holder, M. D.; Holder, Mark D. (1993). „Responses to anomalous gestural sequences by a language-trained dolphin: Evidence for processing of semantic relations and syntactic information”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 122 (2): 184—194. PMID 8315399. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.2.184. 
  • Hockett, C. (1960). „The origin of speech”. Scientific American. 203 (3): 88—96. Bibcode:1960SciAm.203c..88H. PMID 14402211. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88. 
  • Holder, M. D., Herman, L. M. & Kuczaj, S. III (1993). A bottlenosed dolphin's responses to anomalous gestural sequences expressed within an artificial gestural language. In H. R. Roitblat, L. M. Herman & P.E. Nachtigall (Eds): Language and Communication: Comparative Perspectives, 299–308. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Hurford J.R., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Knight, C. (Eds.) (1998) Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Huxley, Julian & Ludwig Koch (photographs by Ylla) 1938. Animal language. Text by Julian Huxley, long-playing record of animal language by Ludwig Koch. London, Country Life. Reprinted and republished by Grosset & Dunlap, New York 1964. Record in the 1964 reissue is by Columbia Special Products, 33 1/3 rpm, small format, ZVT 88894. Side 1 contains Sounds at the Zoo (presumably Zoological Society of London) and African sounds; side 2 African sounds continued.
  • Kako, E. (1999). „Elements of syntax in the systems of three language-trained animals”. Animal Learning & Behavior. 27: 1—14. doi:10.3758/BF03199424Слободан приступ. 
  • Kanwal, J.S.; Matsumura, S.; Ohlemiller, K.; Suga, N. (1994). „Analysis of acoustic elements and syntax in communication sounds emitted by mustached bats”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 94 (3): 1229—1254. Bibcode:1994ASAJ...96.1229K. PMID 7962992. doi:10.1121/1.410273. 
  • Kellogg, W.N., & Kellogg, L.A. (1933). The ape and the child. New York: Whittlesey House (McGraw-Hill).
  • Knight, C., Studdert-Kennedy, M., Hurford, J.R. (Eds.) (2000). The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kohts. N. (1935). Infant ape and human child. Museum Darwinianum, Moscow.
  • Ladygina-Kohts, N.N, & de Waal, F.B.M. (2002). Infant Chimpanzee and Human Child: A Classic 1935 Comparative Study of Ape Emotions and Intelligence (Tr: B. Vekker). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lenneberg, E.H. (1971). „Of language, knowledge, apes, and brains”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1 (1): 1—29. PMID 24197536. S2CID 986088. doi:10.1007/BF01066934. 
  • Miles, H.L. (1990) "The cognitive foundations for reference in a signing orangutan" in S.T. Parker and K.R. Gibson (eds.) "Language" and intelligence in monkeys and apes: Comparative Developmental Perspectives. Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Pinker, S. (1984). Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reprinted in 1996 with additional commentary.
  • Pinker, S.; Bloom, P. (1990). „Natural language and natural selection”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 13 (4): 707—784. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.116.4044Слободан приступ. S2CID 6167614. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081061. 
  • Plooij, F.X. (1978). "Some basic traits of language in wild chimpanzees?" in A. Lock (ed.) Action, Gesture and Symbol. New York: Academic Press.
  • Premack, D. (1971). „Language in a chimpanzee?”. Science. 172 (3985): 808—822. Bibcode:1971Sci...172..808P. PMID 5572906. doi:10.1126/science.172.3985.808. 
  • Roitblat, H.R., Herman, L.M. & Nachtigall, P.E. (Eds.)(1993). Language and Communication: Comparative Perspectives, 299–308. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rumbaugh Duane M. (1980) Language behavior of apes. In Thomas A. Sebok and Jean-Umiker-Sebok(eds.): Speaking of Apes: A Critical Anthology of Two- Way Communication with Man. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 231–259.
  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S.; McDonald, K.; Sevcik, R.A.; Hopkins, W.D.; Rupert, E (1986). „Spontaneous symbol acquisition and communicative use by pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus)”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 115 (3): 211—235. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.140.2493Слободан приступ. PMID 2428917. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.3.211. 
  • Sayigh, L.S., Tyack, P.L., Wells, R.S. & Scott, M.D. (1990). Signature whistles of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): stability and mother-offspring comparisons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 247–260.
  • Schusterman, R. J.; Gisiner, R. (1988). „Artificial language comprehension in dolphins and sea lions: The essential cognitive skills”. The Psychological Record. 34: 3—23. S2CID 148803055. doi:10.1007/BF03394849. 
  • Schusterman, R.J.; Gisiner, R. (1989). „Please parse the sentence: animal cognition in the Procrustean bed of linguistics”. Psychological Record. 39: 3—18. S2CID 151609199. doi:10.1007/BF03395051. 
  • Schusterman, R. J.; Kastak, D. (1993). „A California Sea-Lion (Zalaphos californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations”. The Psychological Record. 43 (4): 823—839. S2CID 147715775. doi:10.1007/BF03395915. 
  • Schusterman, R. J.; Krieger, K. (1984). „California sea lions are capable of semantic comprehension”. The Psychological Record. 38 (3): 311—348. S2CID 148081685. doi:10.1007/BF03395027. 
  • Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Wilkie, R.; McKinnon, A. (2013). „George Herbert Mead on Humans and Other Animals: Social Relations after Human-Animal Studies”. Sociological Research Online. 18 (4): 19. S2CID 146644748. doi:10.5153/sro.3191. 
  • Wittmann, Henri (1991). „Classification linguistique des langues signées non vocalement” (PDF). Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée. 10 (1): 215—88. 

Spoljašnje veze