996 sistem rada
996 sistem rada (kin: 996工作制) je raspored rada koji praktikuju neke kompanije u Narodnoj Republici Kini. Ime je dobio po zahtevu da zaposleni rade od 9:00 do 21:00, 6 dana u nedelji; odnosno 72 časa nedeljno.[1][2][3][4][5][6] Nekoliko internet kompanija u kontinentalnoj Kini usvojilo je ovaj sistem kao svoj zvanični raspored rada. Kritičari tvrde da je sistem kršenje kineskog zakona o radu i nazvali su ga modernim ropstvom.[7][8]
U martu 2019. godine pokrenut je protest „anti-996“ preko platforme GitHub.[9][10][11] Godine 2021, akademska studija kineskih institucija je po prvi put prepoznala postojanje kulture prekomernog rada, poput 996.[12]
Vrhovni narodni sud je 27. avgusta 2021. godine proglasio ovaj sistem rada nezakonitim.[13] Međutim, sumnja se da li će to biti u potpunosti sprovedeno.[14][15]
Reference[uredi | uredi izvor]
- ^ Xue Yujie (2019-03-28). David Paulk, ur. „Chinese Developers Protest Overwork on GitHub”. Sixth Tone (na jeziku: engleski). Arhivirano iz originala 2019-03-31. g. Pristupljeno 2019-03-31.
- ^ Denise Hruby (2018-05-08). „Young Chinese are sick of working long hours”. BBC (na jeziku: engleski). Arhivirano iz originala 2019-04-02. g. Pristupljeno 2019-04-02.
- ^ Zhao, Ang (2018-06-03). „不接受"996"是不能吃苦?媒体:合法权益应获保障” [Do not accept "996" is not able to work hard? Media: Legal rights should be protected]. Xinhuanet (na jeziku: kineski). Workers' Daily. Arhivirano iz originala 2019-03-31. g. Pristupljeno 2019-03-30.
- ^ Sarah Dai; Li Tao (2019-01-29). „China's work ethic stretches beyond '996' as tech companies feel the impact of slowdown”. South China Morning Post (na jeziku: engleski). Arhivirano iz originala 2019-03-31. g. Pristupljeno 2019-03-31.
- ^ Li Yuan (2017-02-22). „China's Grueling Formula for Success: 9-9-6”. The Wall Street Journal (na jeziku: engleski). Arhivirano iz originala 2019-03-31. g. Pristupljeno 2019-03-31.
- ^ Zheping Huang (2019-03-20). „No sleep, no sex, no life: tech workers in China's Silicon Valley face burnout before they reach 30”. South China Morning Post (na jeziku: engleski). Arhivirano iz originala 2019-04-05. g. Pristupljeno 2019-04-05.
- ^ Wang, Jenny Jing (2020). „How managers use culture and controls to impose a '996' work regime in China that constitutes modern slavery”. Accounting & Finance (na jeziku: engleski). 60 (4): 4331—4359. ISSN 1467-629X. doi:10.1111/acfi.12682.
- ^ Lu, Ying-Ying (2019-04-13). „Ep. 42: To 996, or Not to 996, That Is the Question”. Pandaily (na jeziku: engleski). Arhivirano iz originala 2019-04-29. g. Pristupljeno 2019-04-29.
- ^ Yuan Yang (2019-04-03). „China tech worker protest against long working hours goes viral”
. Financial Times (na jeziku: engleski). Arhivirano iz originala 2019-04-03. g. Pristupljeno 2019-04-05.
- ^ Bill Ide (2019-04-04). „China Tech Workers Protest Long Work Hours in Online Campaign”. VOA News (na jeziku: engleski). Arhivirano iz originala 2019-04-05. g. Pristupljeno 2019-04-05.
- ^ Lin Qiqing; Raymond Zhong (2019-04-29). „'996' Is China's Version of Hustle Culture. Tech Workers Are Sick of It.”. The New York Times (na jeziku: engleski). Arhivirano iz originala 2019-05-03. g. Pristupljeno 2019-05-03.
- ^ Javed, Saad Ahmed; Bo, Yu; Tao, Liangyan; Dong, Wenjie (2021-06-07). „The 'Dual Circulation' development model of China: Background and insights”. Rajagiri Management Journal (na jeziku: engleski). ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). ISSN 0972-9968. doi:10.1108/RAMJ-03-2021-0016
.
- ^ „China Spells Out How Excessive 996 Work Culture is Illegal”. Bloomberg.com (na jeziku: engleski). 27. 8. 2021.
- ^ Meng, Siyuan (15. 11. 2021). „China's burned-out tech workers are fighting back against long hours”. MIT Technology Review. Pristupljeno 21. 6. 2022. „But even though authorities and state media seem to be taking a tougher stand, it is unclear when or if the rules that make 996 illegal will be fully enforced.”
- ^ Liu, Hong Yu (24. 1. 2022). „The role of the state in influencing work conditions in China's internet industry: Policy, evidence, and implications for industrial relations”. Journal of Industrial Relations: 12. ISSN 0022-1856. doi:10.1177/00221856211068488
. „The contradictory rulings by the district courts in these cases, one for the employee and two against, suggest that the legislative framework in China is not in a position that can stand firmly to defend workers against the inhumane and unlawful working hours. Wang and Cooke (2021) found a similar level of arbitrariness in court rulings in labour disputes between Chinese platforms and their workers.”