Аустроазијски језици — разлика између измена

С Википедије, слободне енциклопедије
Садржај обрисан Садржај додат
..
Ред 1: Ред 1:
{{Short description|Породица језика континенталне југоисточне Азије}}{{rut}}
'''Аустроазијски језици''' су велика [[језичка породица]] распрострањена у [[Југоисточна Азија|Југоисточној Азији]] и раштрканим заједницама у источној [[Индија|Индији]] и [[Бангладеш]]у. Префикс ''аустро'' у [[Латински језик|латинском]] значи југ, дакле ради се о језицима са југа Азије. Њима се служи око 95 милиона људи.
{{Инфокутија језичка породица
[[Слика:Austroasiatic-en.svg|мини|300п|Распрострањеност аустроазијских језика]]
| name = Аустроазијски језици
| altname = Austro-Asiatic
| region = [[Southeast Asia|Southeast]] and [[South Asia]]
| familycolor = Austroasiatic
| family = One of the world's primary [[Language family|language families]]
| protoname = [[Proto-Austroasiatic language|Proto-Austroasiatic]]
| child1 = [[Munda languages|Munda]]
| child2 = [[Khasi-Palaungic languages|Khasi-Palaungic]]
| child3 = [[Khmuic languages|Khmuic]]
| child4 = ''[[Mang language|Mang]]''
| child5 = [[Pakanic languages|Pakanic]]
| child6 = [[Vietic languages|Vietic]]
| child7 = [[Katuic languages|Katuic]]
| child8 = [[Bahnaric languages|Bahnaric]]
| child9 = ''[[Khmer language|Khmer]]''
| child10 = [[Pearic languages|Pearic]]
| child11 = [[Monic languages|Monic]]
| child12 = [[Aslian languages|Aslian]]
| child13 = [[Nicobarese languages|Nicobarese]]
| iso5 = aav
| glotto = aust1305
| glottorefname = Austroasiatic
| map = Austroasiatic-en.svg
| mapcaption = Распрострањеност аустроазијских језика
| ancestor =
| glottoname =
| notes =
}}

'''Аустроазијски језици''' су велика [[језичка породица]] распрострањена у [[Југоисточна Азија|Југоисточној Азији]] и раштрканим заједницама у источној [[Индија|Индији]] и [[Бангладеш]]у. Префикс ''аустро'' у [[Латински језик|латинском]] значи југ, дакле ради се о језицима са југа Азије. Њима се служи око 95 милиона људи.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.languagesgulper.com/eng/Austroasiatic.html|title=Austroasiatic|website=www.languagesgulper.com|language=en|access-date=15 October 2017|archive-date=29 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190329085717/http://languagesgulper.com/eng/Austroasiatic.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


Лингвисти сматрају да аустроазиски језици поникли из овог региона, док су остали језици који се ту данас говоре ([[Индоевропски језици|индоевропски]], [[тај-кадајски језици|таи-кадаи]], [[Дравидски језици|дравидски]] и [[Сино-тибетански језици|сино-тибетански]]) резултат каснијих миграција.
Лингвисти сматрају да аустроазиски језици поникли из овог региона, док су остали језици који се ту данас говоре ([[Индоевропски језици|индоевропски]], [[тај-кадајски језици|таи-кадаи]], [[Дравидски језици|дравидски]] и [[Сино-тибетански језици|сино-тибетански]]) резултат каснијих миграција.
Ред 9: Ред 39:


Постоји неколико класификација аустроазијских језика спроведених по различитим критеријумима.
Постоји неколико класификација аустроазијских језика спроведених по различитим критеријумима.
{{colbegin|colwidth=30em}}

*[[Мунда језици]] (19 језика, 10 милиона говорника)
*[[Мунда језици]] (19 језика, 10 милиона говорника)
**Северни мунда језици (10 језика, 9,5 милиона говорника)
**Северни мунда језици (10 језика, 9,5 милиона говорника)
Ред 36: Ред 66:
***[[Паљу-пакан језици|паљу-пакан]] (5 језика, 15 хиљада говорника)
***[[Паљу-пакан језици|паљу-пакан]] (5 језика, 15 хиљада говорника)
**[[Никобарски језици|никобарски]] (6 језика, 35 хиљада говорника)
**[[Никобарски језици|никобарски]] (6 језика, 35 хиљада говорника)
{{colend}}

Најзначајнији аустроазијски језици су [[Вијетнамски језик|вијетнамски]] (70 милиона говорника), [[Кмерски језик|кмерски]] (8 милиона), [[Сантали језик|сантали]] (6 милиона) и [[Мундари језик|мундари]] (2 милиона).
Најзначајнији аустроазијски језици су [[Вијетнамски језик|вијетнамски]] (70 милиона говорника), [[Кмерски језик|кмерски]] (8 милиона), [[Сантали језик|сантали]] (6 милиона) и [[Мундари језик|мундари]] (2 милиона).

== Аустроазијске миграције и археогенетика ==

[[:ja:崎谷満|Mitsuru Sakitani]] suggests that [[Haplogroup O-M95|Haplogroup O1b1]], which is common in Austroasiatic people and some other ethnic groups in [[southern China]], and haplogroup O1b2, which is common in today's [[Japanese people|Japanese]], [[Koreans]] and, are the carriers of early rice-agriculturalists from [[Indochina]].<ref>崎谷満『DNA・考古・言語の学際研究が示す新・日本列島史』(勉誠出版 2009年) </ref> Another study suggests that the haplogroup O1b1 is the major Austroasiatic paternal lineage and O1b2 the "para-Austroasiatic" lineage of the, [[Koreans|Korean]] and [[Yayoi people]].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5Z5BDwAAQBAJ&q=japonic+austroasiatic&pg=PA207|title=Language Dispersal Beyond Farming|last1=Robbeets|first1=Martine|last2=Savelyev|first2=Alexander|date=21 December 2017|publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company|isbn=9789027264640|language=en|access-date=15 October 2020|archive-date=31 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331162700/https://books.google.com/books?id=5Z5BDwAAQBAJ&q=japonic+austroasiatic&pg=PA207|url-status=live}}</ref>

A 2021 study by Tagore et al. found that the proto-Austroasiatic speakers split from an Basal East Asian source population, native to [[Mainland Southeast Asia]] and [[Northeast India]], which also gave rise to other [[East Asian people|East Asian-related populations]], including Northeast Asians and [[Indigenous peoples of the Americas]]. The proto-Austroasiatic speakers can be linked to the [[Hoabinhian]] material culture. From Mainland Southeast Asia, the Austroasiatic speakers expanded into the Indian-subcontinent and [[Maritime Southeast Asia]]. There is evidence that later back migration from more northerly East Asian groups (such as [[Kra-Dai]] speakers) merged with indigenous Southeast Asians, contributing to the fragmentation observed among modern day Austroasiatic-speakers. In the [[Indian subcontinent]], Austroasiatic speakers, specifically [[Munda languages|Mundari]], intermixed with the local population. Furthermore they concluded that their results do not support a genetic relationship between Ancient Southeast Asian hunter-gatherers (Hoabinhians) with [[Papuans|Papuan-related groups]], as previously suggested by McColl et al. 2018, but that these Ancient Southeast Asians are characterized by Basal East Asian ancestry. The authors finally concluded that genetics do not necessarily correspond with linguistic identity, pointing to the fragmentation of modern Austroasiatic speakers.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Tagore|first1=Debashree|last2=Aghakhanian|first2=Farhang|last3=Naidu|first3=Rakesh|last4=Phipps|first4=Maude E.|last5=Basu|first5=Analabha|date=29 March 2021|title=Insights into the demographic history of Asia from common ancestry and admixture in the genomic landscape of present-day Austroasiatic speakers|url= |journal=BMC Biology|volume=19|issue=1|pages=61|doi=10.1186/s12915-021-00981-x|issn=1741-7007|pmc= |pmid= |quote=McColl et al. suggested that ancient SEA hunter-gatherers (Hòabìnhian) share some ancestry with the Onge, Jehai, Papuan, and Indian populations. We therefore ran the ADMIXTURE analysis including the Jarawa, Onge, and the Papuans as possible founder populations in addition to the previous set of AAI, AAM, TB, and EA. Contrary to their claim, we found no evidence of Onge, Jarawa, and Papuan ancestries in the ANC samples (results of ADMIXTURE run hence not shown). We regressed the AAI ancestry (and the EA-like ancestry) of the ancient genomes jointly on the age of the sample and the latitude where these samples were found (Supplementary Table 7). While latitude was only marginally significant for the AAI-like ancestry, it was extremely significant for EA-like ancestry, showing a decreasing trend of EA-like ancestry as one moves from North to South (Fig. 6e, Supplementary Figure 14 in Additional file 1). This bolsters the hypothesis of the origin of EA-like ancestry in Southern China and a movement due south.}}</ref>

== References ==
{{Reflist}}

== Sources ==
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* Adams, K. L. (1989). ''Systems of numeral classification in the Mon–Khmer, Nicobarese and Aslian subfamilies of Austroasiatic''. Canberra, A.C.T., Australia: Dept. of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. {{ISBN|0-85883-373-5}}
* {{cite book |last=Alves |first=Mark J. |year=2014 |chapter=Mon-Khmer |editor1=Rochelle Lieber |editor2=Pavel Stekauer |title=The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology |pages=520–544 |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press }}
* Alves, Mark J. (2015). Morphological functions among Mon-Khmer languages: beyond the basics. In N. J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds.), ''Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: the state of the art''. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, 531–557.
* Bradley, David (2012). "[https://www.academia.edu/1542763/Languages_and_Language_Families_in_China Languages and Language Families in China] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170430061616/http://www.academia.edu/1542763/Languages_and_Language_Families_in_China |date=30 April 2017 }}", in Rint Sybesma (ed.), ''Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics''.
* [[Byomkes Chakrabarti|Chakrabarti, Byomkes]]. (1994). ''A Comparative Study of Santali and Bengali''.
* {{Citation |last1=Chaubey|first1=G.|last2=Metspalu|first2=M.|last3=Choi|first3=Y.|last4=Magi|first4=R.|last5=Romero|first5=I. G.|last6=Soares|first6=P.|last7=van Oven|first7=M.|last8=Behar|first8=D. M.|last9=Rootsi|first9=S.|last10=Hudjashov|first10=G.|last11=Mallick|first11=C. B.|last12=Karmin|first12=M.|last13=Nelis|first13=M.|last14=Parik|first14=J.|last15=Reddy|first15=A. G.|last16=Metspalu|first16=E.|last17=van Driem|first17=G.|last18=Xue|first18=Y.|last19=Tyler-Smith|first19=C.|last20=Thangaraj|first20=K.|last21=Singh|first21=L.|last22=Remm|first22=M.|last23=Richards|first23=M. B.|last24=Lahr|first24=M. M.|last25=Kayser|first25=M.|last26=Villems|first26=R.|last27=Kivisild|first27=T.| display-authors = 1| year =2010 | title =Population Genetic Structure in Indian Austroasiatic Speakers: The Role of Landscape Barriers and Sex-Specific Admixture | journal =Mol Biol Evol | doi =10.1093/molbev/msq288| doi-access =free | volume=28 |issue=2| pages=1013–1024 | pmid=20978040 | pmc=3355372}}
* [[Gérard Diffloth|Diffloth, Gérard]]. (2005). "The contribution of linguistic palaeontology and Austro-Asiatic". in Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench and Alicia Sanchez-Mazas, eds. ''The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics.'' 77–80. London: Routledge Curzon. {{ISBN|0-415-32242-1}}
* Filbeck, D. (1978). ''T'in: a historical study''. Pacific linguistics, no. 49. Canberra: Dept. of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. {{ISBN|0-85883-172-4}}
* Hemeling, K. (1907). ''Die Nanking Kuanhua''. (German language)
* Jenny, Mathias and [[Paul Sidwell]], eds (2015). ''[http://www.brill.com/products/reference-work/handbook-austroasiatic-languages-2-vols The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150305205754/http://www.brill.com/products/reference-work/handbook-austroasiatic-languages-2-vols |date=5 March 2015 }}''. Leiden: Brill.
* Peck, B. M., Comp. (1988). ''An Enumerative Bibliography of South Asian Language Dictionaries''.
* Peiros, Ilia. 1998. ''Comparative Linguistics in Southeast Asia.'' Pacific Linguistics Series C, No. 142. Canberra: Australian National University.
* Shorto, Harry L. edited by Sidwell, Paul, Cooper, Doug and Bauer, Christian (2006). ''[https://www.academia.edu/11344550/A_Mon-Khmer_comparative_dictionary A Mon–Khmer comparative dictionary] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180809114321/http://www.academia.edu/11344550/A_Mon-Khmer_comparative_dictionary |date=9 August 2018 }}''. Canberra: Australian National University. Pacific Linguistics. {{ISBN|0-85883-570-3}}
* Shorto, H. L. ''Bibliographies of Mon–Khmer and Tai Linguistics''. London oriental bibliographies, v. 2. London: Oxford University Press, 1963.
* {{cite book |last=Sidwell |first=Paul |author-link=Paul Sidwell |year=2005 |chapter=Proto-Katuic Phonology and the Sub-grouping of Mon–Khmer Languages |chapter-url=http://sealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/sidwell2005proto.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://sealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/sidwell2005proto.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |editor=Paul Sidwell |title=SEALSXV: papers from the 15th meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistic Society |location=Canberra |publisher=Pacific Linguistics |access-date=11 March 2020 }}
* {{cite book | surname = Sidwell | given = Paul | title = Classifying the Austroasiatic languages: history and state of the art | series = LINCOM studies in Asian linguistics | volume = 76 | location = Munich | publisher = Lincom Europa | year = 2009 | isbn = 978-3-929075-67-0 | url = }}
* {{cite journal | surname = Sidwell | given = Paul | title = The Austroasiatic central riverine hypothesis | journal = Journal of Language Relationship | volume = 4 | year = 2010 | pages = 117–134 | url = http://www.jolr.ru/files/%2851%29jlr2010-4%28117-134%29.pdf | access-date = 28 October 2011 | archive-date = 30 January 2022 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20220130082310/http://www.jolr.ru/files/%2851%29jlr2010-4%28117-134%29.pdf | url-status = live }}
* van Driem, George. (2007). Austroasiatic phylogeny and the Austroasiatic homeland in light of recent population genetic studies. ''Mon-Khmer Studies, 37'', 1-14.
* Zide, Norman H., and Milton E. Barker. (1966) ''Studies in Comparative Austroasiatic Linguistics'', The Hague: Mouton (Indo-Iranian monographs, v. 5.).
* {{Citation | last1 =Zhang | display-authors =etal | year =2015 | title =Y-chromosome diversity suggests southern origin and Paleolithic backwave migration of Austro-Asiatic speakers from eastern Asia to the Indian subcontinent | journal =Scientific Reports |volume=5 |page=1548 | doi =10.1038/srep15486 | pmc =4611482 | bibcode =2015NatSR...515486Z | pmid=26482917}}
* {{cite book|editor-last=Sidwell|editor-first=Paul|editor-last2=Jenny|editor-first2=Mathias|title=The Languages and Linguistics of Mainland Southeast Asia|publisher=De Gruyter|date=2021|isbn=978-3-11-055814-2|doi=10.1515/9783110558142|s2cid= |url=https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/205815/1/10.1515_9783110558142-fm.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/205815/1/10.1515_9783110558142-fm.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live}}
* Mann, Noel, Wendy Smith and Eva Ujlakyova. 2009. ''[http://li.payap.ac.th/images/stories/survey/Linguistic%20Clusters%20of%20Mainland%20Southeast%20Asia%20A%20Description%20of%20the%20Clusters.pdf Linguistic clusters of Mainland Southeast Asia: an overview of the language families.]'' Chiang Mai: Payap University.
* {{cite journal | title = The Talaing Language | given = Francis | surname = Mason | author-link = Francis Mason | journal = Journal of the American Oriental Society | volume = 4 | year = 1854 | pages = 277, 279–288 | jstor = 592280 }}
* {{cite journal | given = Paul | surname = Sidwell | title = Issues in Austroasiatic Classification | journal = Language and Linguistics Compass | volume = 7 | issue = 8 | year = 2013 | pages = 437–457 | doi = 10.1111/lnc3.12038 }}
* Sidwell, Paul. 2016. [https://sites.google.com/view/paulsidwell/bibliography-of-austroasiatic-linguistics Bibliography of Austroasiatic linguistics and related resources].
* E. K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier Press.
* Gregory D. S. Anderson and Norman H. Zide. 2002. Issues in Proto-Munda and Proto-Austroasiatic Nominal Derivation: The Bimoraic Constraint. In Marlys A. Macken (ed.) Papers from the 10th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, South East Asian Studies Program, Monograph Series Press. pp.&nbsp;55–74.
{{Refend}}


== Спољашње везе ==
== Спољашње везе ==
{{Commonscat|Austro-Asiatic languages}}
{{Commons category|Austro-Asiatic languages}}
*[http://www.ethnologue.com/show_family.asp?subid=90152 Класификација]
*[http://www.ethnologue.com/show_family.asp?subid=90152 Класификација]
*[http://www.anu.edu.au/~u9907217/languages/languages.html Предавања Пола Сидвела о мон-кмерским језицима] {{Wayback|url=http://www.anu.edu.au/~u9907217/languages/languages.html |date=20070202213156 }}
*[http://www.anu.edu.au/~u9907217/languages/languages.html Предавања Пола Сидвела о мон-кмерским језицима] {{Wayback|url=http://www.anu.edu.au/~u9907217/languages/languages.html |date=20070202213156 }}
* [[wikt:Appendix:Swadesh lists for Austro-Asiatic languages|Swadesh lists for Austro-Asiatic languages]] (from Wiktionary's [[wikt:Appendix:Swadesh lists|Swadesh-list appendix]])
* [http://multitree.org/codes/ausa Austro-Asiatic] at the Linguist List MultiTree Project (not functional as of 2014): Genealogical trees attributed to Sebeok 1942, Pinnow 1959, Diffloth 2005, and Matisoff 2006
* [http://sealang.net/monkhmer/ Mon–Khmer Languages Project] at [[SEAlang Library|SEAlang]]
* [http://sealang.net/munda/ Munda Languages Project] at [[SEAlang Library|SEAlang]]
* [http://projekt.ht.lu.se/rwaai RWAAI] (Repository and Workspace for Austroasiatic Intangible Heritage)
* [[hdl:10050/00-0000-0000-0003-66A4-2@view|RWAAI Digital Archive]]
* [http://lacito.vjf.cnrs.fr/pangloss/languages/AA_Ferlus_en.php Michel Ferlus's recordings of Mon-Khmer (Austroasiatic) languages] (CNRS)


{{Језичке породице}}
{{Језичке породице}}

Верзија на датум 6. април 2023. у 05:03

Аустроазијски језици
Austro-Asiatic
Географска распрострањеностSoutheast and South Asia
Језичка класификацијаOne of the world's primary language families
ПрајезикProto-Austroasiatic
Подподела
ISO 639-5aav
Глотологaust1305[1]
{{{mapalt}}}
Распрострањеност аустроазијских језика

Аустроазијски језици су велика језичка породица распрострањена у Југоисточној Азији и раштрканим заједницама у источној Индији и Бангладешу. Префикс аустро у латинском значи југ, дакле ради се о језицима са југа Азије. Њима се служи око 95 милиона људи.[2]

Лингвисти сматрају да аустроазиски језици поникли из овог региона, док су остали језици који се ту данас говоре (индоевропски, таи-кадаи, дравидски и сино-тибетански) резултат каснијих миграција.

Аустроазијски језици се традиционално деле у две групе: мон-кмер језици Југоисточне Азије и североисточне Индије и мунда језици источне и централне Индије, делова Бангладеша и острва Никобари. Укупно их има 151, од којих 132 припада мон-кмер групи, док је 19 језика у групи мунда.

Класификација

Постоји неколико класификација аустроазијских језика спроведених по различитим критеријумима.

  • Мон-кмер језици (132 језика, 85 милиона говорника)
    • Источни мон-кмер
    • Северни мон-кмер
      • каси (3 језика, 1,1 милиона говорника)
      • палаунг-ва (20 језика, 1,8 милиона говорника)
      • кму (14 језика, 0,6 милиона говорника)
    • Јужни мон-кмер
      • мон (2 језика, 1 милион говорника)
      • асли (19 језика, 60 хиљада говорника)
      • паљу-пакан (5 језика, 15 хиљада говорника)
    • никобарски (6 језика, 35 хиљада говорника)

Најзначајнији аустроазијски језици су вијетнамски (70 милиона говорника), кмерски (8 милиона), сантали (6 милиона) и мундари (2 милиона).

Аустроазијске миграције и археогенетика

Mitsuru Sakitani suggests that Haplogroup O1b1, which is common in Austroasiatic people and some other ethnic groups in southern China, and haplogroup O1b2, which is common in today's Japanese, Koreans and, are the carriers of early rice-agriculturalists from Indochina.[3] Another study suggests that the haplogroup O1b1 is the major Austroasiatic paternal lineage and O1b2 the "para-Austroasiatic" lineage of the, Korean and Yayoi people.[4]

A 2021 study by Tagore et al. found that the proto-Austroasiatic speakers split from an Basal East Asian source population, native to Mainland Southeast Asia and Northeast India, which also gave rise to other East Asian-related populations, including Northeast Asians and Indigenous peoples of the Americas. The proto-Austroasiatic speakers can be linked to the Hoabinhian material culture. From Mainland Southeast Asia, the Austroasiatic speakers expanded into the Indian-subcontinent and Maritime Southeast Asia. There is evidence that later back migration from more northerly East Asian groups (such as Kra-Dai speakers) merged with indigenous Southeast Asians, contributing to the fragmentation observed among modern day Austroasiatic-speakers. In the Indian subcontinent, Austroasiatic speakers, specifically Mundari, intermixed with the local population. Furthermore they concluded that their results do not support a genetic relationship between Ancient Southeast Asian hunter-gatherers (Hoabinhians) with Papuan-related groups, as previously suggested by McColl et al. 2018, but that these Ancient Southeast Asians are characterized by Basal East Asian ancestry. The authors finally concluded that genetics do not necessarily correspond with linguistic identity, pointing to the fragmentation of modern Austroasiatic speakers.[5]

References

  1. ^ Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin; Bank, Sebastian, ур. (2016). „Austroasiatic”. Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. 
  2. ^ „Austroasiatic”. www.languagesgulper.com (на језику: енглески). Архивирано из оригинала 29. 3. 2019. г. Приступљено 15. 10. 2017. 
  3. ^ 崎谷満『DNA・考古・言語の学際研究が示す新・日本列島史』(勉誠出版 2009年) 
  4. ^ Robbeets, Martine; Savelyev, Alexander (21. 12. 2017). Language Dispersal Beyond Farming (на језику: енглески). John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN 9789027264640. Архивирано из оригинала 31. 3. 2023. г. Приступљено 15. 10. 2020. 
  5. ^ Tagore, Debashree; Aghakhanian, Farhang; Naidu, Rakesh; Phipps, Maude E.; Basu, Analabha (29. 3. 2021). „Insights into the demographic history of Asia from common ancestry and admixture in the genomic landscape of present-day Austroasiatic speakers”. BMC Biology. 19 (1): 61. ISSN 1741-7007. doi:10.1186/s12915-021-00981-x. „McColl et al. suggested that ancient SEA hunter-gatherers (Hòabìnhian) share some ancestry with the Onge, Jehai, Papuan, and Indian populations. We therefore ran the ADMIXTURE analysis including the Jarawa, Onge, and the Papuans as possible founder populations in addition to the previous set of AAI, AAM, TB, and EA. Contrary to their claim, we found no evidence of Onge, Jarawa, and Papuan ancestries in the ANC samples (results of ADMIXTURE run hence not shown). We regressed the AAI ancestry (and the EA-like ancestry) of the ancient genomes jointly on the age of the sample and the latitude where these samples were found (Supplementary Table 7). While latitude was only marginally significant for the AAI-like ancestry, it was extremely significant for EA-like ancestry, showing a decreasing trend of EA-like ancestry as one moves from North to South (Fig. 6e, Supplementary Figure 14 in Additional file 1). This bolsters the hypothesis of the origin of EA-like ancestry in Southern China and a movement due south. 

Sources

  • Adams, K. L. (1989). Systems of numeral classification in the Mon–Khmer, Nicobarese and Aslian subfamilies of Austroasiatic. Canberra, A.C.T., Australia: Dept. of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. ISBN 0-85883-373-5
  • Alves, Mark J. (2014). „Mon-Khmer”. Ур.: Rochelle Lieber; Pavel Stekauer. The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. стр. 520—544. 
  • Alves, Mark J. (2015). Morphological functions among Mon-Khmer languages: beyond the basics. In N. J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: the state of the art. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, 531–557.
  • Bradley, David (2012). "Languages and Language Families in China Архивирано 30 април 2017 на сајту Wayback Machine", in Rint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics.
  • Chakrabarti, Byomkes. (1994). A Comparative Study of Santali and Bengali.
  • Chaubey, G.; et al. (2010), „Population Genetic Structure in Indian Austroasiatic Speakers: The Role of Landscape Barriers and Sex-Specific Admixture”, Mol Biol Evol, 28 (2): 1013—1024, PMC 3355372Слободан приступ, PMID 20978040, doi:10.1093/molbev/msq288Слободан приступ 
  • Diffloth, Gérard. (2005). "The contribution of linguistic palaeontology and Austro-Asiatic". in Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench and Alicia Sanchez-Mazas, eds. The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics. 77–80. London: Routledge Curzon. ISBN 0-415-32242-1
  • Filbeck, D. (1978). T'in: a historical study. Pacific linguistics, no. 49. Canberra: Dept. of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. ISBN 0-85883-172-4
  • Hemeling, K. (1907). Die Nanking Kuanhua. (German language)
  • Jenny, Mathias and Paul Sidwell, eds (2015). The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages Архивирано 5 март 2015 на сајту Wayback Machine. Leiden: Brill.
  • Peck, B. M., Comp. (1988). An Enumerative Bibliography of South Asian Language Dictionaries.
  • Peiros, Ilia. 1998. Comparative Linguistics in Southeast Asia. Pacific Linguistics Series C, No. 142. Canberra: Australian National University.
  • Shorto, Harry L. edited by Sidwell, Paul, Cooper, Doug and Bauer, Christian (2006). A Mon–Khmer comparative dictionary Архивирано 9 август 2018 на сајту Wayback Machine. Canberra: Australian National University. Pacific Linguistics. ISBN 0-85883-570-3
  • Shorto, H. L. Bibliographies of Mon–Khmer and Tai Linguistics. London oriental bibliographies, v. 2. London: Oxford University Press, 1963.
  • Sidwell, Paul (2005). „Proto-Katuic Phonology and the Sub-grouping of Mon–Khmer Languages” (PDF). Ур.: Paul Sidwell. SEALSXV: papers from the 15th meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistic Society. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. Архивирано (PDF) из оригинала 2022-10-09. г. Приступљено 11. 3. 2020. 
  • Sidwell, Paul (2009). Classifying the Austroasiatic languages: history and state of the art. LINCOM studies in Asian linguistics. 76. Munich: Lincom Europa. ISBN 978-3-929075-67-0. 
  • Sidwell, Paul (2010). „The Austroasiatic central riverine hypothesis” (PDF). Journal of Language Relationship. 4: 117—134. Архивирано (PDF) из оригинала 30. 1. 2022. г. Приступљено 28. 10. 2011. 
  • van Driem, George. (2007). Austroasiatic phylogeny and the Austroasiatic homeland in light of recent population genetic studies. Mon-Khmer Studies, 37, 1-14.
  • Zide, Norman H., and Milton E. Barker. (1966) Studies in Comparative Austroasiatic Linguistics, The Hague: Mouton (Indo-Iranian monographs, v. 5.).
  • Zhang; et al. (2015), „Y-chromosome diversity suggests southern origin and Paleolithic backwave migration of Austro-Asiatic speakers from eastern Asia to the Indian subcontinent”, Scientific Reports, 5: 1548, Bibcode:2015NatSR...515486Z, PMC 4611482Слободан приступ, PMID 26482917, doi:10.1038/srep15486 
  • Sidwell, Paul; Jenny, Mathias, ур. (2021). The Languages and Linguistics of Mainland Southeast Asia (PDF). De Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-055814-2. doi:10.1515/9783110558142. Архивирано (PDF) из оригинала 2022-10-09. г. 
  • Mann, Noel, Wendy Smith and Eva Ujlakyova. 2009. Linguistic clusters of Mainland Southeast Asia: an overview of the language families. Chiang Mai: Payap University.
  • Mason, Francis (1854). „The Talaing Language”. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 4: 277, 279—288. JSTOR 592280. 
  • Sidwell, Paul (2013). „Issues in Austroasiatic Classification”. Language and Linguistics Compass. 7 (8): 437—457. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12038. 
  • Sidwell, Paul. 2016. Bibliography of Austroasiatic linguistics and related resources.
  • E. K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier Press.
  • Gregory D. S. Anderson and Norman H. Zide. 2002. Issues in Proto-Munda and Proto-Austroasiatic Nominal Derivation: The Bimoraic Constraint. In Marlys A. Macken (ed.) Papers from the 10th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, South East Asian Studies Program, Monograph Series Press. pp. 55–74.

Спољашње везе